THE SYSTEM OF THE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION QUALITY MANAGEMENT: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Authors

Keywords:

communication, communicative barriers, communicative competence, communication styles, “I-statement”, pedagogic activity, specialists in physical education and sport.

Abstract

The article deals with the current tendencies in the quality management of university education in the context of modern European practices. The evolution of the quality management system development in the European Union and the modern approaches to the quality problem of university education have been traced. The main tendencies in the development of the quality management system of university education in Ukraine have been determined, both at the state level and at the level of a separate institution of higher education. The expediency of implementing the best European practices for maintaining university education quality in Ukraine has been proved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Nina Batechko, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 15 Heroyiv Oborony Str., 03042 Kyiv, Ukraine

Doctor of Science (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Higher and Applied Mathematics

References

El-Khawas, E., Thah, T. (1998). Internal review to assure quality: corporative perspectives on evolving practice. The Tertiary Education and Management, 4 (2), 95–101 (eng).

Geodegebuure, L. C. J., Maassen, P. A. M., Westerheijden, D. F. (1992). Quality assessment in higher education. In L. C. J. Goedegebuure, P. A. M. Maassen, D. F.

Westerheijden (Eds.), Peer review and performance indicators: quality assessment in British and Dutch higher education (pp. 15–36). Utrecht, Netherland: Lemma (eng).

Gordon, G. (1998). Approaches to effective internal processes to quality management: an initial analysis. The Tertiary Education and Management, 4 (4), 295–301 (eng).

Harvey, L. (1997). Quality is not free! Quality monitoring alone will not improve quality.

The Tertiary Education and Management, 3 (2), 133–143 (eng).

Jacobsson, P. (1990). A plea for more consistent definition of quality in education and research. Quality and communication for improvement: proceedings 12th European AIR Forum, University Claude Bernard Ecole Normale Supйrieure Lyon, France, September 9–12, 1990, Enschede: EAIR, a European Higher Education Society. Utrecht, Netherland: Lemma, 59–84 (eng).

Westerheijden, D. F. (1992). Peers, performance and power: quality assessment in the Netherlands. In L. C. J. Goedegebuure, P. A. M. Maassen, D. F. Westerheijden (Eds.), Peer review and performance indicators: quality assessment in British and Dutch higher education (pp. 183–207). Utrecht, Netherland: Lemma (eng).

Hinzburh, M. D., Kovalenko, S. Ye., & Kliun, A. M. (2016). Standarty na systemy keruvannia: mizhnarodnyj ta ievropejs'kyj dosvid i joho zaprovadzhennia v Ukraini [Standards for control systems: international and European experience and its implementation in Ukraine]. Standartyzatsiia. Sertyfikatsiia. Yakist', 1, 7– 16 (ukr).

Sysoieva, S. O., & Sokolova, I. V. (2016). Teoriia i praktyka vyschoi osvity: navch. posibnyk [Theory and Practice of Higher Education]. Kyiv– Mariupol, Ukraine (ukr).

Chejz, R. B., Ekvylajn, N. D., & Yakobs, R. F. (2001). Proyzvodstvennyj y operatsyonnyj menedzhment [Production and Operations Management]. Moscow, Russian Federation: Yzdatel'skyj dom «Vyl'iams» (rus).

Downloads


Abstract views: 249

Published

2019-10-22

How to Cite

[1]
N. Batechko, “THE SYSTEM OF THE UNIVERSITY EDUCATION QUALITY MANAGEMENT: THE EXPERIENCE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION”, OD, no. 3-4, pp. 342–357, Oct. 2019.

Issue

Section

Comparative Research in Education