Features of the Organization of the Educational Process in the Conditions of Distance Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2023.13

Keywords:

analysis of methods, forms and types of education, effectiveness evaluation methodology, educational process, features of the organization, distance learning modes

Abstract

Currently, among the many existing types and forms of education, distance learning is becoming one of the priority areas of pedagogical and educational-methodical activities of many universities, colleges, and general educational institutions. Therefore, the main existing traditional and modern types, methods and forms of education are analyzed in the article from the angle of suitability for use in remote form.

  Special attention is paid to the advantages, psychological and pedagogical features and problematic aspects of distance learning.

The comparative characteristics of synchronous and asynchronous modes of distance learning were considered and carried out, the positive and negative aspects of each mode were determined.

A general methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of methods, organizational forms, and types of training has been developed, which is based on theoretical and empirical methods of scientific research and makes it possible to objectively evaluate the effectiveness of training for a wide range of educational programs.

To evaluate the effectiveness of methods and forms of distance learning, modern methods of scientific research were used. An analysis of teaching methods was carried out, namely methods for acquiring knowledge (motivational-learning, problem-searching, visual, game, reproductive) and methods for improving knowledge, skills and abilities (practical, interactive, creative, control and self-control methods).

The results of the study showed that effective types of training are: distance learning, modular learning, interactive learning, dual education, problem-based learning and programmed learning.

The most effective and relevant methods of distance learning have been determined: practical, problem-solving, visual, creative, interactive, motivational-learning methods and methods of control and self-control.

According to the results of qualitative and quantitative analysis, the most effective forms of distance learning were identified, namely: individual, video conferences, Google applications, independent work, correspondence, free schedule, video training, game training, online chat.

The results of the analysis enable teachers to make a qualified choice of the most effective methods and forms for both traditional and distance learning, and also indicate directions for improving the most effective approaches to learning.

The intended prospects for further research consist in the improvement of the proposed approaches to increase the effectiveness of the forms and methods of training in order to raise the level of the quality of training.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bublyk V. V. Shlyakhamy dystantsiynoyi osvity ta elektronnoho navchannya [Ways of distance education and electronic learning]. Naukovi zapysky NaUKMA. Komp'yuterni nauky. 2018. T. 1. S. 4–9. https://doi.org/10.18523/2617-3808.2018.4-9

Vyshcha osvita Ukrayiny tendentsiyi rozvytku : informatsiynyy byuletenʹ [Higher education of Ukraine development trends: information bulletin], / uklad. O. M. Dovzhenko ; NB ZDMU. Zaporizhzhya : ZDMU, 2020. 32 s. URL: http://dspace.zsmu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/11027

Halata, S. Yak pidtrymaty chesnistʹ dystantsiynoho navchannya? [How to support the integrity of distance learning?]. Osvita Ukrayiny, № 18–19, 11 trav. 2020. S. 10. https://saiup.org.ua/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Integrity-bulletin-08.pdf

Hurevych, R., Konoshevsʹkyy, L., Opushko, N. Tsyfrovizatsiya osvity suchasnoho suspilʹstva: problemy, dosvid, perspektyvy [Digitization of education in modern society: problems, experience, prospects]. Osvitolohichnyy dyskurs, 2022, № 3-4 (38-39). https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2022.342

Kozlakova H. Dystantsiyna vyshcha tekhnichna osvita v umovakh karantynu [Distance higher technical education in quarantine conditions]. Vyshcha osvita Ukrayiny. № 2. 2020. S. 67–74.

Koncepciya rozvytku dystancijnoyi osvity v Ukrayini: Postanovavid 20 grudnya 2000. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrayiny`. http://www.osvita.org.ua/distance/pravo/00.html.

Mala, I. Dystantsiyne navchannya yak diyevyy instrument upravlinsʹkoyi osvity [Distance learning as an effective tool of management education]. Vcheni zapysky Universytetu «KROK», 2022, № 2 (66), 132–151. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2022-66-132-151

Pidlisnyy D. Smart–osvita u smart–suspilʹstvi: mozhlyvi shlyakhy adaptatsiyi [Smart education in a smart society: possible ways of adaptation]. Vyshcha osvita Ukrayiny. № 1. 2019. S. 82– 83.

Pro zatverdzhennya Polozhennya pro dystantsiyne navchannya: Nakaz vid 25.04.2013 r. № 466. Ministerstvo osvity i nauky Ukrayiny. http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0703-13

Tymoshchuk O.V. Osoblyvosti vplyvu dystantsiynoho navchannya na yakistʹ zhyttya studentiv suchasnykh zakladiv riznykh typiv [Peculiarities of the effect of distance learning on the quality of life of students of modern institutions of various types]. Art of Medicine. № 4. 2020 .S. 124–128.

Ukrayinska naukova internet–spilnota. Blog ukrayinskoy i naukovoyi internet-spilnoty. URL: http://www.naukaonline.orgnnauka-online.orgnw.nauka-online.org/keywords/dystantsiyne-navchannya

Ukrayinska Systema Dystancijnogo Navchannya – UDL System / Ukrainian Dastance Learning System. URL: http://www.udl.org.ua

Shulikin, D. Dystantsiynyy rezhym: student•sʹkyy, vykladatsʹkyy ta universytet•sʹkyy vymir. [Remote mode: student, teaching and university dimension]. Osvita Ukrayiny. № 29, 27 lypnya. 2020. S. 10–11.

Shulikin, D. Dosvid dystantsiynykh akredytatsiy[Experience of remote accreditations]. Osvita Ukrayiny. № 26, 6 lyp. 2020. S. 7.

Yaroshenko T.O. Dystantsiyne navchannya v systemi vyshchoyi osvity: suchasni tendentsiyi [Distance learning in the system of higher education: modern trends]. https://doi.org/10.30929/2307-9770.2019.07.04.01

Altunoglu A. Initial perceptions of open higher education students with learner management systems. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE). 2017. № 18 (3). P. 96–104. doi: https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.328939

Barak M. Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education. 2017. № 47 (2). P. 283–303. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501- y

Lebler D. Popular music pedagogy: peer learning in practice. MusicEducationResearch. 2008. Vol. 10, Issue 2. Р. 193–213. https://doi.org 10.1080/14613800802079056

Mooc Mooc. Electronic resource. Nothing wil stop the incessantmarch. URL: http:www.moocmooc.com.

Schlosser, L.A.; Simonson, M.R.; Hudgins, T.L. Distance education: definitions and glossary of terms, Third edition. Charlotte, N.C.: IAP -Information Age Pub., 2010, p.1.

Downloads


Abstract views: 633

Published

2023-03-31

How to Cite

[1]
O. Oleksiuk, L. Teriaieva, and V. Teriaiev, “Features of the Organization of the Educational Process in the Conditions of Distance Learning”, OD, no. 1(40), pp. 40–58, Mar. 2023.

Issue

Section

Informatization of Education