Individual Components of the Methodology for Using Journal and Conference Systems in Scholarly Peer Review

Authors

  • Tetiana Vakaliuk Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, Institute for Digitalisation of Education of the NAES of Ukraine, Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6825-4697
  • Iryna Mintii Institute for Digitalisation of Education of the NAES of Ukraine, Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, Lviv Polytechnic National University https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3586-4311

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829/2025.3.6

Keywords:

Open Journal Systems, conference management systems, OJS, EasyChair, Microsoft CMT

Abstract

The peer review processes of scholarly works have undergone fundamental changes with the implementation of digital journal and conference systems that automate editorial workflow stages from manuscript submission to coordination of expert evaluation procedures. Effective utilization of modern scholarly publishing management platforms, such as Open Journal Systems, ScholarOne Manuscripts, Editorial Manager, EasyChair, and Microsoft CMT, requires participants to possess specific digital competencies. The relevance of this research is determined by the critically low level of conference systems usage (28%) and journal systems usage (38%) among national academic staff, as evidenced by the results of a formative experiment. The aim of the study is to identify and systematize key components of the methodology for using journal and conference systems in scholarly peer review processes to develop necessary skills for effective participation in expert evaluation procedures through digital platforms. The research methodology is based on analyzing functional capabilities of leading digital platforms, systematizing review procedures, and identifying specific features of working with different system types. The conducted analysis allowed for identification and systematization of methodology components into three main groups: technical (interface navigation, profile management, document processing), organizational (understanding review stages, meeting deadlines, interaction coordination), and competency-based (mastering expert evaluation criteria, ethical principles). Sixteen key questions for quality reviewing were identified, ranging from thematic relevance to scholarly writing style. The practical value of the research lies in creating a foundation for developing training programs for academic staff professional development in the field of digital expert evaluation platforms. The systematized methodology components can serve as guidelines for forming appropriate educational modules and contribute to enhancing digital literacy in academic peer review processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aïmeur, E., Brassard, G., Gambs, S., & Schonfeld, D. (2012). P3ERS: Privacy-preserving peer review system. Transactions on Data Privacy, 5(3), 553–578.

Arapinis, M., Bursuc, S., & Ryan, M. (2012). Privacy supporting cloud computing: ConfiChair, a case study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7215, 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28641-4_6.

Borchard, L., Biondo, M., Kutay, S., & Weiss, A.P. (2015). Making journals accessible front & back: Examining open journal systems at CSU northridge. OCLC Systems and Services, 31, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/OCLC-02-2014-0013.

Castillo-Velazquez, J.-I., & Trigueros-Galicia, M.-I. (2018). UTILCON beta: A free trainer for conference management systems in Spanish. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 38th Central America and Panama Convention, CONCAPAN 2018. 8596536. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONCAPAN.2018.8596536.

de Brito, R.F., & Shintaku, M. (2015). Usability of the submission process in a journal system. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 529, 653–656. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21383-5_109.

Grigas, V., Gudinavičius, A., Petreikis, T., & Šuminas, A. (2023). An Exploratory Study into Professional Scholarly Journals Publishing Software Adoption in Lithuania. Information and Media, 96, 179–201. https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2023.96.73.

Lira, E.K.D.S., de Barros, G.G., Prestes, J.R., & Dias Miranda, A.C. (2019). Brazilian federal universities and the use of open journal systems. Ciencia da Informacao, 48(3), 374–381.

Maia, F.C.A., & Farias, M.G.G. (2025). Procedures for adopting open peer review in scientific journals: Reports of experiences from editors. Perspectivas em Ciencia da Informacao, 30, e-52559. https://doi.org/10.1590/1981-5344/52559.

Manalu, S.R., Willy, & Priatna, W.S. (2017). Development of Review Rating and Reporting in Open Journal System. Procedia Computer Science, 842–845. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTICon.2017.8096370.

Singh, N., Jung, I., Han, H., & Vega-Muñoz, A. (2022). Green Information System (GIS) Model in the Conference Sector: Exploring Attendees' Adoption Behaviors for Conference Apps. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 2229–2243. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S370657.

Verma, L. (2021). Ojs security analysis: Issues, reasons, and possible solutions. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology. 41(5). 391–396. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.5.15975.

Vubangsi, M., & Al-Turjman, F. (2022). Design and Implementation of a Conference Attendance Monitoring System Using Blockchain and AI Technologies. Proceedings – 2022 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Everything, AIE 2022 (pp. 197–202). https://doi.org/10.1109/AIE57029.2022.00044.

Mintii, I. S., & Vakaliuk, T. A. (2024). Doslidnytskyi skladnyk tsyfrovoi kompetentnosti naukovykh i naukovo-pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv: rezultaty konstatuvalnoho eksperymentu [Research component of digital competence of researchers and academic staff: the results of a statement experiment]. Naukovyi chasopys Ukrainskoho derzhavnoho universytetu imeni Mykhaila Drahomanova. Seriia 2. Kompiuterno-oriientovani systemy navchannia – Scientific Journal of the Mykhailo Dragomanov Ukrainian State University. Series 2. Computer-oriented learning systems, 23(30), 16-25. https://doi.org/10.31392/UDU-nc.series2.2024.23(30). [in Ukrainian]

Downloads


Abstract views: 14

Published

2025-10-05

How to Cite

[1]
T. Vakaliuk and I. Mintii, “Individual Components of the Methodology for Using Journal and Conference Systems in Scholarly Peer Review”, OD, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 63–75, Oct. 2025.

Issue

Section

Innovations are in Education