Methodological Component of Digital Competence of Researchers and Academic Staff: The results of a statistical experiment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829/2024.4.7

Keywords:

digital competence, academic staff, research staff, methodological component, word processors, spreadsheet processors, presentation editors, cloud services, Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, statement experiment

Abstract

Тhe article examines the level of formation of the methodological component of digital competence among researchers and academic staff based on the analysis of results from a statement experiment conducted within the distance course «Development of Digital Competence of Research and Academic Staff Through Open Educational and Scientific Information Systems». The survey involved 344 respondents, predominantly academic staff from higher education institutions of III-IV accreditation levels, aged 36-45 years with over 10 years of work experience. The study of the methodological component of digital competence was carried out through analysis of respondents’ use of basic tools for creating educational and methodological materials: text and spreadsheet processors and presentation editors. The choice of these tools is justified by their universality, independence from discipline or education level, ability to create both traditional and digital educational resources, and support for collaborative work through cloud technologies. The research results showed that Microsoft Office products (MS Word, MS Excel, MS PowerPoint). At the same time, there is significant penetration of Google cloud services (Google Docs, Google Sheets, Google Slides). Alternative tools, including LaTeX publishing systems, Prezi, Canva, and others, are much less popular. It was found that most respondents use several tools in parallel, with the most common combination being Microsoft and Google products. Analysis of relationships between socio-demographic characteristics and digital tool choices showed that younger teachers more frequently use Google services, institutional leaders demonstrate the highest level of usage across all service types, while non-teaching staff show the lowest level of tool diversification. Based on the obtained results, recommendations were formulated for planning professional development programs and developing digital competence among different categories of staff, particularly regarding access to corporate versions of the most common tools and organization of training in advanced features of spreadsheet processors and cloud services.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aldhaen, E. (2024). The Influence of Digital Competence of Academicians on Students’ Engagement at University Level: Moderating effect of the pandemic outbreak. Competitiveness Review, 2024. Vol.34, № 1, pр. 51–71 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-01-2023-0008

Cabaron, R. R. (2024). Exploring the Impact of Digital Literacy on the Self-Efficacy of Maritime Education Faculty. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 2024, Vol. 11, № 7, pр. 176–181 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.07.019

Canal, M. N., de las Mercedes de Obesso, M., & Rivera, C. A. (2024). Does Educators’ Digital Competence Improve Entrepreneurial Students’ Learning Outcomes? International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2024, Vol. 20, pр. 1707–1730 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00921-x

Deiniatur, M., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2024). Digital Literacy Practices of Novice English as a Foreign Language Teacher in Writing Research Articles for Publication. Journal of Education and Learning, 2024, Vol. 18, № 1, pр. 165–172 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i1.20899

Digital Spain Development. (2022). Government of Spain, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Digital Transformation, Madrid, [in English]. https://espanadigital.gob.es/en/implementation-agenda

Digital Strategy 2025. (2016). Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, Berlin, 2016, 60 p. [in English]. https://www.de.digital/DIGITAL/Redaktion/EN/Publikation/digital-strategy-2025.pdf

Digital Agenda 2030. (2023). Republic of Estonia, Ministry of Economic Affairs and Communications. Tallinn, 54 p. [in English]. https://www.mkm.ee/sites/default/files/documents/2022-04/Digi%C3%BChiskonna%20arengukava_ENG.pdf

Government report: Digital Compass. (2023). Finnish Government, Helsinki, 2023, 63 p. [in English]. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-383-609-9

Kuzminska et. al (2024). Integrating Digital Competencies of Researchers into Ph.D. Curricula: A case study on open science education. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2024, Vol. 3679, pp. 195–208[in English]. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3679/paper36.pdf

Fang Lu et al (2024). Research and Practice on the Blended Online and Offline Training Model for Digital Literacy Cultivation of University Teachers. International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), Macau, pр. 240–244[in English]. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISET61814.2024.00054

Redecker, C. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. Luxembourg, 95 p. [in English]. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770

Ravikumar, T. et al (2024). Relationship between Digital Learning, Digital Literacy and Academic Performance of Higher Education Students: Moderated Mediation Role of Critical Thinking. International Research Journal of Multidisciplinary Scope, 2024, Vol. 5, № 3, pр. 39–50 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.47857/irjms.2024.v05i03.01054

Rojas-Osorio, M., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S., & Alvarez-Risco, A. (2024). Self-Perception of University Teachers on Their Digital Teaching Competence: The case of Peru. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 2024, Vol. 7, № 1, pр. 168–181 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2024.7.1.8

Spirin, O. M., Ivanova, S. M., Franchuk, N. P., & Kilchenko, A. V. (2024). Osnovni skladnyky tsyfrovoi kompetentnosti naukovykh i naukovo-pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv [Main Components of Digital Competence of Аcademic and Scientific-Pedagogical Staff of Higher Education Institutions in Ukraine]. UNESCO Chair Journal “Lifelong Professional Education in the XXI Century”, 2024, 2(10) [in Ukrainian].

Tok Kose, B., & Kocak, O. (2024). The predictors of academics’ online information searching strategies: A structural model integrating cognitive absorption and digital literacy. Library & Information Science Research, 2024, Vol. 46, № 2, pр. 101–299 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2024.101299

Downloads


Abstract views: 76

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

[1]
I. Mintii and T. Vakaliuk, “Methodological Component of Digital Competence of Researchers and Academic Staff: The results of a statistical experiment”, OD, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 64–72, Dec. 2024.

Issue

Section

Competency Approach in Education