SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE TRANSFORMATION OF THE PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE INTO INNOVATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2021.47Keywords:
innovation, innovative competence, socio-psychological aspects, self-efficacy, intelligence, readiness for innovationAbstract
The article dwells on various socio-psychological aspects necessary for the transformation of the pedagogical knowledge into innovation, highlights the patterns of this process, focuses on the integration of knowledge, the development of intelligence and self-efficacy of an individual, creating a social context that is favourable for fostering innovations and the development of the innovative activities of a teacher. The essence of the emergence of pedagogical innovation and the stages that must take place: the search for appropriate innovation and its implementation; repetition, dissemination of innovations; application in professional activities. The results of the diagnostics of the innovative competence of lecturers of Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University are presented.
Downloads
References
Babyna O., Andreiushyna T. Upravlinnia znanniamy yak skladovoiu potentsialu
pidpryiemstva. Vodnyi transport. 2012. Vyp. 2. S. 101–106.
Butenko N. Upravlinnia znanniamy v korporatsiiakh. Biznes-Inform. 2015. № 11. S. 414–419.
Hulbs O. A. Psykholohichni osoblyvosti innovatsiinoi diialnosti suchasnoho vykladacha VNZ. Prychornomorski psykholohichni studii,2017. S.47-51
Druker P. Эffektyvnoe upravlenye : per. s anhl. M. Kotelnykova – M. : OOO «Yzd-vo Astrel»; OOO «Yzd-vo AST»; ZAO NPP «Ermak», 2004. – 284 s.
Kremen V. Innovatsiina liudyna: Ukraina na shliakhu yevropeiskoi intehratsii. Ahora, 2007. № 5. S. 5–9.
Illiashenko S., Shypulina Yu., Illiashenko N., Komarnytska H. Upravlinnia znanniamy v systemi innovatsiinoho rozvytku orhanizatsii. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii, 2017. № 1. S. 231–241.
Lychnost: teoryy, еksperymentі, uprazhnenyia.- SPb.:praim-Evroznak, 2001.
s.
Smulson M.L. Psykholohiia rozvytku intelektu:monohrafiia. Vyd.2-e,vyprav. ta dop. Kyiv:Nora-druk, 2003.298 s.
Tarasevych V. Pro synerhetyku innovatsii. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 2009. № 4. S. 65–73.
Upravlinnia znanniamy. Pidruchnyk./V.Pryimak.K.: Kyivskyi natsionalnyi universytet imeni T.Shevchenko,2019.240 s.
Chudakova V. P. Upravlinska kompetentnist kerivnykiv z formuvannia hotovnosti pedahohiv do innovatsiinoi diialnosti v umovakh osvitnoho seredovyshcha profilnoi shkoly. Upravlinnia shkoloiu. Vydavnycha hrupa OSNOVA, 2012. № 19-21. S. 10–20.
Borjigen C. Mass collaborative knowledge management: Towards the next generation of knowledge management studies. Program: electronic library and information systems, 2015. No. 49 (3). P. 325–342.
Heller, K.A., Monks,F. J.M.,Sternberg,R.J.,& Subotnik, R.F. (Eds.). International handbook of giftedness ant talent (2 nd Ed.). Oxford, England: Pergamon, 2000. pp.139-150.
Jasanoff, S. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and the Social Order, 2004. pp. 1-317. (doi: 10.4324/9780203413845)
Khoruzha L., Bratko M., Kotenko О., Melnychenko О., Proshkin V . The Study of the Higher School Lecturer's Competence in Ukraine: Diagnostics and Analytics. The New Education Review (55(1)).,2019. pp. 233-245. ISSN 1732-6729.(SCOPUS)
Renzulli, J.S. The three-ring conception of giftedness:A developmental model for creative productivity. In R.J.Sternberg& J.E. Davidson (Eds.) Conceptions of giftedness,1986. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp.53-92.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Educological discourse
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Автори зберігають за собою всі авторські права та одночасно надають журналу право першої публікації на умовах лізенції Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, що дозволяє розповсюджувати даний матеріал із зазначенням авторства та первинної публікації в даному журналі.
