Ongoing Enhancement of ESL Education Through Reflective Surveys for University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2024.2.11Keywords:
university students, English as a Second Language (ESL), reflective teaching, feedback, collaborative learning, relevance to future career, wartimeAbstract
Reflective surveys in global best practices are used to ensure that the course meets the varied linguistic needs of university students. Therefore, we aimed to analyze quantitative and qualitative data on university students’ feedback across various dimensions of ESL courses and provide recommendations aimed at improving and sustaining the quality of teaching English at the university level. To achieve this, we used a mixed-method research design to obtain quantitative and qualitative data which revealed that university students expressed their overall satisfaction with the ESL courses. They especially appreciated the possibility of completing assignments asynchronously, as well as relaxed deadlines and discussions. They suggested creating study groups according to language proficiency levels and making them smaller to ensure an individual approach. The results of the research showed that students were mostly positive regarding ESL course content, teaching methods, instructor approach, assignments and assessments, class participation, technology integration, group work, resources and materials, time management, English proficiency, collaborative learning, and relevance to future careers. We observed statistically that students were especially enthusiastic about their teachers’ support and guidance, as well as about relaxed deadlines. This study highlighted the importance for students to communicate with each other in groups, play games, have discussions, do problem-solving tasks, focus on their professional needs, establish rapport with their teachers, get regular feedback and error correction. In conclusion, the study contributes to the importance of reflective surveys in holistically evaluating and refining the ESL learning experience for university students. In future research, reflective surveys could be used for teachers and students from several higher education institutions to further enrich our knowledge in this area.
Downloads
References
Astia, M. Corrective feedback in English class. IJOLTL: Indonesian Journal of Language Teaching and Linguistics. 2018. 3(3). P. 111-122. https://doi.org/110.30957/ijotl-tl.v3i3.502.
Barnard, R., Ryan, J. (Eds.). Reflective practice: Voices from the field. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2017. 158 p.
Chugai, O. Games and competitions to transform an English for specific purposes class into student-centered. Pedagogy. Bulgarian Journal of Educational Research and Practic. 2020. 92(3), P. 442-449. URL: https://pedagogy.azbuki.bg/en/pedagogics/pedagogyarticle/sadarzhanie-na-sp-pedagogika-2020-g/sp-pedagogika-knizhka-3-2020-godina-xcii/.
Chugai, O. Technical university students’ feedback: a critical factor in teaching English during wartime. Prospects and innovations of science. 2023. 12(30). P. 16-28. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-4952-2023-12(30)-16-28.
Dewey, J. How we think. Boston: D. C. Heath & CO., Publishers, 1910. 242 p. https://doi.org/10.1037/10903-000.
Dewey, J. Democracy and education. New York: The Macmillan Company, 2016. 57 p. www.gutenberg.org.
Dvoráková, K., Emmer, J., Janktová, R., Klementová, K. From F2F to ERT: University Students’ Perception of Remote Learning during the First COVID-19 Lockdown. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science. 2021. 14(2). P. 89-100. http://www.ejbest.org.
Ghaye, T. Teaching and learning through reflective practice: A practical guide for positive action (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2011. 224 p.
Harmer, J. How to Teach English. Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2007. 288 p.
Hattie, J., Timperley, H. The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research. 2007. 77(1). P. 81-112. URL: https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.
Henderson, M., Ryan, T., Boud, D., Dawson, P., Phillips, M., Molloy, E., Mahoney, P. The usefulness of feedback. Active Learning in Higher Education. 2021. 22(3). P. 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787419872393.
Hilton, R., Barnes, C. A. Comparative Analysis of Students’ Perceptions of Learning in Online Versus Traditional Courses. The Journal of Education for Business. 2020. 14. P. 2-11. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/359380815.
Jurs, P., Kulberga, I. Pedagogical challenges in Distance Learning during COVID-19 conditions – Experience of Latvia. World Journalon Educational Technology: Current Issues. 2021. 13(4). P. 947-955. URL: https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i4.6278 (дата звернення: 15.01.2024).
Kustini, S. Exploring ESP Learners’ Self-Regulation in Online Learning Environment. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature. 2022. 9(1). P. 120-129. URL: https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.359.
Larrivee, B. Transforming teaching practice: Becoming the critically reflective teacher. Reflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives. 2000. 1(3). P. 293-307, https://doi.org/10.1080/713693162.
Lavrysh, Y. Digital educational technologies as a means of individualizing foreign language learning for students at universities. In Intellectual capital is the foundation of innovative development: Innovations in EFL teaching. Monographic series «European Science». Book 18. Part 2. Karlsruhe: ScientificWorld-NetAkhatAV Lußstr, 2023. P. 32-51.
Nurmukhamedov, U. New ways in teaching with games. TESOL International Association: TESOL PRESS, 2020. 256 p. https://www.tesol.org/bookstore.
Pentón Herrera L. J., Martínez-Alba, G. Social-emotional learning in the English language classroom: Fostering growth, self-care, and independence. Alexandria: TESOL Press, 2021. 115 p.
Quinton, S., Smallbone, T. Feeding forward: Using feedback to promote student reflection and learning – a teaching model. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 2010. 47(1). P. 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903525911.
Salih, A., Omar, L. Reflective Teaching in EFL Online Classrooms: Teachers’ Perspective. Journal of Language Teaching and Research. 2022. 13. P. 261-270. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.05.
Synekop, O., Lavrysh, Y., Lytovchenko, I., Chugai, O., Lukianenko, V. Use of Games in ESP Classes: Perceptions from Students and Teachers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET). 2023. 18(16), P. 74–86. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i16.41275.
Westerlund, R., Chugai, O., Petrenko, S., Zuyenok, I. Teaching and learning English at higher educational institutions in Ukraine through pandemics and wartime. Advanced Education. 2023. 22. P. 12-26. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.283353.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Educological discourse
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Автори зберігають за собою всі авторські права та одночасно надають журналу право першої публікації на умовах лізенції Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, що дозволяє розповсюджувати даний матеріал із зазначенням авторства та первинної публікації в даному журналі.
