The Role of Group Projects in Learning a Foreign Language In Distance Format For Medical Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829/2025.1.8Keywords:
Foreign language proficiency, Medical education, Distance learning, Group projects, Collaborative learning, English for Medical Purposes, Intercultural communicationAbstract
In an era where medical education is increasingly globalized, the need for healthcare professionals to master foreign languages – particularly English – has grown in importance. Concurrently, the shift toward distance learning environments, accelerated by technological advances and public health considerations, challenges educators to develop effective, student-centered teaching strategies online. This study explored the potential of group projects as a means to enhance foreign language proficiency among medical students learning in a fully online setting. Adopting a mixed-methods design, the research involved 60–80 students enrolled in an «Foreign Language for Professional Purposes» (FLPP) course. Students worked in small groups on two major online projects over a semester, supported by synchronous and asynchronous communication tools, structured guidelines, and regular instructor feedback. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-intervention surveys assessing self-perceived language competence, confidence in collaborative online work, and intercultural awareness, as well as rubric-based evaluations of student-produced medical materials. Qualitative insights were gleaned from semi-structured interviews and discourse analysis of project outputs and online discussions, exploring learners’ experiences, perceptions of effectiveness, and interactional patterns. The findings indicated significant improvements in students’ self-assessed language skills, comfort with specialized medical terminology, and teamwork confidence. Students reported increased engagement, citing meaningful, authentic tasks as catalysts for deeper linguistic and cultural understanding. Instructors observed enhanced participation, more accurate use of professional vocabulary, and smoother online collaboration as the semester progressed. However, challenges emerged, including time-zone coordination, digital literacy gaps, and initial hesitancies in online communication. Overall, this study suggests that well-designed group projects, facilitated through digital platforms and supported by clear pedagogical structures, can positively impact foreign language development for medical students learning at a distance. The results underscore the importance of balancing technological tools, instructional scaffolds, and culturally responsive task design. These insights may guide educators and curriculum developers in refining online foreign language instruction and better preparing future healthcare professionals for the linguistic and intercultural demands of modern medical practice.
Downloads
References
Al Qhtani, A., Al Swedan, N., Almulhim, A., Aladwan, R., Alessa, Y., AlQhtani, K., & Aldhaan, O. (2021). Online versus classroom teaching for medical students during COVID-19: measuring effectiveness and satisfaction. BMC Med. Educ., 21, 452. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02888-1.
Bardus, I., Herasymenko, Y., Nalyvaiko, O., Rozumna, T., Vaseiko, Y., & Pozdniakova, V. (2021). Organization of Foreign Languages Blended Learning in COVID-19 Conditions by Means of Mobile Applications. Revista Romaneasca Pentru Educatie Multidimensionala, 13(2), 268-287. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/13.2/421
Beckett, G. H., & Slater, T. (2005). The project framework: A tool for language, content, and skills integration. ELT Journal, 59(2), 108–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/eltj/cci024
Cao, Z., Zhang, Z., Liu, Y., & Pu, L. (2022). Exploring English for medical purposes (EMP) teacher cognition in the Chinese context. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 1003739. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1003739
Demydchuk, A. S., & Shamalo, S. M. (2024). Specifics of teaching in medical institutions of higher education in distance format. Medical Education, (3), 32–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11603/m.2414-5998.2024.3.14707
Ellaway, R., & Masters, K. (2008). AMEE Guide 32: E-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Medical Teacher, 30(5), 455–473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802108331
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52-60.
Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
Hampel, R., & Stickler, U. (2012). The use of videoconferencing to support multimodal interaction in an online language classroom. ReCALL, 24, 116 - 137. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401200002X
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2008/11/asynchronous-and-synchronous-elearning
Lowenthal, P. R., Dunlap, J. C., & Snelson, C. (2017). Live synchronous web meetings in asynchronous online courses: Reconceptualizing virtual office hours. Online Learning Journal, 21(4), 177–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v21i4.1285
Mofrad, M. N. (2015). Using blended learning model for large group teaching in medical education. Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal, 6(2), 439–447. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/656
Nalyvaiko, O., & Vakulenko, A. (2021). Canvas LMS: opportunities and features. Educological discourse, 34, 154-172.
O’Dowd, R. (2011). Online foreign language interaction: Moving from the periphery to the core of foreign language education. Language Teaching, 44(3), 368–380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000194
Ortega, P., Francone, N. O., Santos, M. P., Girotti, J. A., Shin, T. M., Varjavand, N., & Park, Y. S. (2021). Medical Spanish in US medical schools: a national survey to examine existing programs. Journal of general internal medicine, 36, 2724-2730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06735-3
Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203074640
Stoller, F. (2006). Establishing a theoretical foundation for project-based learning in second and foreign language contexts. In G. H. Beckett & P. C. Miller (Eds.), Project-based second and foreign language education: Past, present, and future (pp. 19–40). Information Age Publishing.
Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press.
Watson, J. R., Siska, P., & Wolfel, R. L. (2013). Assessing gains in language proficiency, cross‐cultural competence, and regional awareness during study abroad: A preliminary study. Foreign Language Annals, 46(1), 62-79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12016
World Health Organization. (2013). Transforming and scaling up health professionals' education and training: WHO Education Guidelines 2013. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/93635
Yelahina, N.I. (2023). Teachersʼ professional competence development as an integral part of higher medical education in the United States and Ukraine. Medical Education, 4, 84-89.
Yin, X., Saad, M. R. B. M., & Halim, H. B. A. (2023). A systematic review of critical thinking instructional pedagogies in EFL writing: What do we know from a decade of research. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101363. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101363.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Educological discourse

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Автори зберігають за собою всі авторські права та одночасно надають журналу право першої публікації на умовах лізенції Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, що дозволяє розповсюджувати даний матеріал із зазначенням авторства та первинної публікації в даному журналі.