ELECTRONIC EXAMINATION TASKS CREATION USING DISTANCE LEARNING PLATFORM MOODLE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2020.3.10Keywords:
dynamic electronic exam tasks, distance learning, electronic exam tasks, distance learning platform, static electronic exam tasks, testingAbstract
The introduction of distance learning due to the COVID-19 pandemic in the world poses new challenges not only to the organization of the learning process, but also the development of algorithms for distance assessment, development of methods for academic integrity in distance learning platforms in student-teacher interaction. The article provides an algorithm for creating tests in the distance learning system Moodle. The concepts of static and dynamic electronic examination tasks are introduced. Means of control of observance of academic integrity during filling of electronic examination tasks are analyzed: features of test setting (test date, test opening time, test duration, restriction of test availability; availability of the test by group, user profile photo settings for additional identification), means of identification of a distance learning platform (access to electronic examination tasks for registered users in the distance learning platform with login and password identification, personal account, features of the organization of examination in a distance format (combining the answering in the electronic examination task with a synchronous group session (with a moderator and other students) or a personal session (with an examiner)), use of additional plugins of a distance learning platform (for example Safe Exam Browser quiz access rule). Mathematical modeling of combinations probabilities and frequency of meeting of electronic examination tasks of different types during the exam is carried out. Algorithms for creating static and dynamic e-tasks can be used to conduct final exams in a distance learning format, as well as to support a mixed format of education in secondary, specialized, higher education.
Downloads
References
• Аванесов В.С. Теория и методика педагогических измерений. ЦТ и МКО УГТУ-УПИ, 2005. 98 с.
• Анисимов А.М. Работа в системе дистанционного обучения Moodle: учебное пособие / А. М. Анисимов. – 2-е изд. испр. и дополн. – Харьков, ХНАГХ, 2009. 292 с.
• Болюбаш Н.М. Педагогічне тестування в системі LMS MOODLE. Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, 2017. Том 60. №4. С. 116–127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v60i4.1726
• Ляшенко О.І., Жук Ю.О. Тестові технології оцінювання компетентностей учнів. Київ, Україна: Педагогічна думка, 2015.
• Методичні рекомендації зі створення тестових завдань та тестів у системі управління навчальними матеріалами MOODLE / В. П. Сергієнко, В. М. Франчук, Л.О. Кухар та ін. [За заг. редакцією професора Сергієнка В. П.]. К.: НПУ імені М.П. Драгоманова, 2014. 100 с.
• Щербина О.А. Нові засоби оцінювання компетентностей в Moodle. Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, 2016. т. 55. №5. С. 96–104. [Електронний ресурс]. Доступно: http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1435/1078.
• Almaiah M.A., Al-Khasawneh A., Althunibat A. Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 2020, 1–20. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
• Baig M., Gazzaz Z. J., Farouq M. Blended Learning: The impact of blackboard formative assessment on the final marks and students' perception of its effectiveness. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2020. 36(3), 327–332. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.3.1925
• Bussières J. F., Métras M. É., Leclerc G. Use of Moodle, ExamSoft, and Twitter in a first-year pharmacy course. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2012. 76 (5), 94. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe76594
• Campo M., Amandi A., Biset, J.C. A software architecture perspective about Moodle flexibility for supporting empirical research of teaching theories. Education and Information Technologies, 2020. 1–26. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10291-4
• Chen, B., Fan, Y., Zhang, G., Liu, M., & Wang, Q. Teachers' networked professional learning with MOOCs. PloS one, 2020. 15 (7), e0235170. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235170
• de Leeuw R.A., Westerman M., Walsh K., Scheele F. Development of an Instructional Design Evaluation Survey for Postgraduate Medical E-Learning: Content Validation Study. Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. 21 (8), e13921. DOI: 10.2196/13921
• Halkoaho A., Matveinen M., Leinonen V., Luoto K., Keränen T. Education of research ethics for clinical investigators with Moodle tool. BMC medical ethics, 2013. 14, 53. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-53
• Keener, T. A., Galvez Peralta, M., Smith, M., Swager, L., Ingles, J., Wen, S., & Barbier, M. Student and faculty perceptions: appropriate consequences of lapses in academic integrity in health sciences education. BMC medical education, 2019. 19(1), 209. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1645-4
• Kim J. Learning and Teaching Online During Covid-19: Experiences of Student Teachers in an Early Childhood Education Practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 2020. 1–14. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s13158-020-00272-6
• Oliveira A.C., Mattos S., Coimbra M. Development and Assessment of an E-learning Course on Pediatric Cardiology Basics. JMIR medical education, 2017. 3(1), e10. https://doi.org/10.2196/mededu.5434
• Sáiz-Manzanares M.C., Marticorena-Sánchez R., Díez-Pastor, J.F., García-Osorio C. I. Does the Use of Learning Management Systems with Hypermedia Mean Improved Student Learning Outcomes? Frontiers in psychology. 2019.10, 88. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00088
• Saqr M., Nouri J., Vartiainen H., Malmberg J. What makes an online problem-based group successful? A learning analytics study using social network analysis. BMC medical education, 2020. 20(1), 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-01997-7
• Vaona A., Banzi R., Kwag K.H., Rigon G., Cereda D., Pecoraro V., Tramacere I., Moja, L. E-learning for health professionals. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2018. 1 (1), CD011736. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011736.pub2
• Wotto M. The Future High Education Distance Learning in Canada, the United States, and France: Insights from Before COVID-19 Secondary Data Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 2020. 0047239520940624. DOI: 10.1177/0047239520940624
References
• Avanesov, V. S. (2005) Teoriya i metodika pedagogicheskikh izmerenij [Theory and methodology of pedagogical measurements]. CT i MKO UGTU-UPI, 98 (rus).
• Anisimov, A. M. (2009) Rabota v sisteme distanczionnogo obucheniya Moodle: uchebnoe posobie [Work in distance learning system Moodle: a tutorial] / A. M. Anisimov. 2-e izd. ispr. i dopoln. Khar`kov, KhNAGKh, 292 (rus).
• Boliubash, N. (2017) Pedagogichne testuvannya v sy`stemi LMS MOODLE [Pedagogical testing in LMS MOODLE]. Information Technologies and Learning Tools. 60 (№ 4). P. 116–127 (ukr). DOI: https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v60i4.1726
• Lyashenko, O. I., Zhuk Yu. O. Testovi texnologiyi ocinyuvannya kompetentnostej uchniv [Test technologies for assessing the competencies of students]. Kyiv, Ukraine: Pedagogichna dumka, 2015 (ukr).
• Metody`chni rekomendaciyi zi stvorennya testovy`x zavdan` ta testiv u sy`stemi upravlinnya navchal`ny`my` materialamy` MOODLE [Methodical recommendations for creating test tasks and tests in the management system of educational materials MOODLE] (2014) / V.P. Sergiyenko, V.M. Franchuk, L. O. Kuxar ta in. [Za zag. redakciyeyu profesora Sergiyenka V.P.]. K.: NPU imeni M. P. Dragomanova, 100 (ukr).
• Shherbyna, O. A. Novi zasoby` ocinyuvannya kompetentnostej v Moodle [New tools of competencies evaluation in Moodle]. ITLT, 2016. vol. 55, №5, pp. 96–104. [Online]. Available: http://journal.iitta.gov.ua/index.php/itlt/article/view/1435/1078. (ukr)
• Almaiah, M. A., Al-Khasawneh, A., & Althunibat, A. (2020). Exploring the critical challenges and factors influencing the E-learning system usage during COVID-19 pandemic. Education and Information Technologies, 1–20. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10219-y
• Bussières, J. F., Métras, M. É., & Leclerc, G. (2012). Use of Moodle, ExamSoft, and Twitter in a first-year pharmacy course. American journal of pharmaceutical education, 76(5), 94. DOI: 10.5688/ajpe76594
• Baig, M., Gazzaz, Z. J., & Farouq, M. (2020). Blended Learning: The impact of blackboard formative assessment on the final marks and students' perception of its effectiveness. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 36(3), 327–332. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.36.3.1925
• Campo, M., Amandi, A., & Biset, J. C. (2020). A software architecture perspective about Moodle flexibility for supporting empirical research of teaching theories. Education and Information Technologies, 1–26. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-020-10291-4
• Chen, B., Fan, Y., Zhang, G., Liu, M., & Wang, Q. (2020). Teachers' networked professional learning with MOOCs. PloS one, 15 (7), e0235170. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235170
• de Leeuw, R. A., Westerman, M., Walsh, K., & Scheele, F. (2019). Development of an Instructional Design Evaluation Survey for Postgraduate Medical E-Learning: Content Validation Study. Journal of medical Internet research, 21(8), e13921. DOI: 10.2196/13921
• Halkoaho, A., Matveinen, M., Leinonen, V., Luoto, K., & Keränen, T. (2013). Education of research ethics for clinical investigators with Moodle tool. BMC medical ethics, 14, 53. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-53
• Keener, T. A., Galvez Peralta, M., Smith, M., Swager, L., Ingles, J., Wen, S., & Barbier, M. (2019). Student and faculty perceptions: appropriate consequences of lapses in academic integrity in health sciences education. BMC medical education, 19 (1), 209. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1645-4
• Kim, J. (2020). Learning and Teaching Online During Covid-19: Experiences of Student Teachers in an Early Childhood Education Practicum. International Journal of Early Childhood, 1–14. Advance online publication. DOI: 10.1007/s13158-020-00272-6
• Oliveira, A. C., Mattos, S., & Coimbra, M. (2017). Development and Assessment of an E-learning Course on Pediatric Cardiology Basics. JMIR medical education, 3 (1), 10. DOI:10.2196/mededu.5434
• Sáiz-Manzanares, M. C., Marticorena-Sánchez, R., Díez-Pastor, J. F., & García-Osorio, C. I. (2019). Does the Use of Learning Management Systems With Hypermedia Mean Improved Student Learning Outcomes? Frontiers in psychology, 10, 88. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00088
• Saqr, M., Nouri, J., Vartiainen, H., & Malmberg, J. (2020). What makes an online problem-based group successful? A learning analytics study using social network analysis. BMC medical education, 20(1), 80. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-020-01997-7
• Vaona, A., Banzi, R., Kwag, K. H., Rigon, G., Cereda, D., Pecoraro, V., Tramacere, I., & Moja, L. (2018). E-learning for health professionals. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 1 (1), CD011736. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011736.pub2
• Wotto, M. (2020). The Future High Education Distance Learning in Canada, the United States, and France: Insights From Before COVID-19 Secondary Data Analysis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 0047239520940624. DOI: 10.1177/0047239520940624
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Educological discourse
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Автори зберігають за собою всі авторські права та одночасно надають журналу право першої публікації на умовах лізенції Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, що дозволяє розповсюджувати даний матеріал із зазначенням авторства та первинної публікації в даному журналі.
