QUESTIONNAIRE «TEACHER THROUGH THE EYES OF STUDENTS» AS A TOOL FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF EDUCATION QUALITY IN UNIVERSITIES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829.2020.2.6Keywords:
questionnaire, teachers, poll, students, quality of educationAbstract
The article deals with the effectiveness of the questionnaire "Teacher through the eyes of students" and the practical implementation of the form as a tool for assessing the personal and professional qualities of teachers and their direct links with the student in the context of pedagogical, sociological, managerial dimensions and cross-cultural sociological research.
Student evaluation is required to adjust actions in educational processes and to make changes to the organization’s management, educational programs, and learning technologies. The efficiency and effectiveness of the educational process in higher education depends crucially on two key people - the teacher and the student. Students are the main consumers of educational outcomes. Therefore, in order to determine the degree of student satisfaction, the quality of teaching and teaching methods and the correspondence of the real learning process to the expectations of students, teaching makes it possible to make adjustments to the content of the course, improve yourself as an author and improve the quality of the educational product provided, which will undoubtedly lead to improvement of the process , which both students and teachers are interested in. According to the university leadership, studies of this type will help to increase the effectiveness of teachers’ professional activity, stimulate cooperation between both sides of the educational process.
Different approaches to the formation of questions of the questionnaire of world universities with emphasis on pedagogical skills, contact with the audience, students’ interest in subjects, relevance to future professional activity are revealed. The author of the research proposed his own questionnaire, tested in a pilot sociological research and theoretically useful for educators and the administrative corps, which will encourage the teacher to improve himself.
Downloads
References
• Ерофеева Н. Е. Мониторинг «Преподаватель глазами студентов» как инструмент регулирования профессиональной деятельности педагога и повышения качества обучения в вузе. «Науковедение». 2015. Том 7. №5. URL: http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/229PVN515.pdf. DOI: 10.15862/229PVN515
• Жабенко О.В. Професійний розвиток науково-педагогічних працівників університетів України: особливості організації оцінювання. Молодий вчений. 2019. № 8 (72). С. 234–240. URL: http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/ 2019/9/80.pdf DOI: 10.32839/2304-5809/2019-9-73-80
• Кошевая С.Е. Постановка задачи разработки мобильного приложения для проведения анкетирования «Преподаватель глазами студентов». Научные труды КубГТУ. 2018. № 3. С. 200–203.
• Купрій Т.Г. Соціологічне опитування «Викладач очима студентів» як засіб вимірювання якості освіти ЗВО Київські філософські студії-2019. Матеріали наукової конференції (м. Київ, 16-17 травня 2019 р.): тези доповідей / за заг. ред. проф. Р.О. Додонова. Київ: Київський університет імені Бориса Грінченка, 2019. – С. 314–318
• Литвинова Т. А., Овсянко Е. В., Залавина С. В., Саматова И. М., Городкова Е. В., Пономаренко Ю. Л., Овсянко Я. У. Управление качеством учебного процесса и педагогической деятельностью через анкетирование обучающихся. Вестник Новосибирского государственного университета. Педагогические науки. 2008. № 2. С. 54–59
• Chan Y.F., & Shuhaily, O. A Case Study of Student Evaluation of Teaching in University. International Education Studies. 2011. № 4(1). Р. 44-50.
• Chan Y.F. Student Evaluation of Lecturer Performance Among Private University Students Canadian. Social Science. 2012. Vol. 8. № 4. Р. 238-243.
• Horban, O., Kravchenko, O., Martych, R., & Yukhymenko, N. The regulatory functions of education in behavioral models. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2019. № (3), Р. 152–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2019-3/23.
• Horban O., Kuprii T., Martych R., & Panasiuk L. Implications of total quality management in Ukrainian higher education institutions: international experience. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2020. № (2), Р. 126–130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-2/126
• Koshmanova T. S., Hapon N. P., & Carter C. C. Extreme social situations in the narratives of Ukrainian teacher candidates. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2007. № 23 (4). Р. 215–225.
• Magno C., & Sembrano J. The Role of Teacher Efficacy and Characteristics on Teaching Effectiveness, Performance, and Use of Learner-Centered practices. The Asia PacificEducation Researcher. 2008. № 16(1). Р. 73–90.
• Marsh H.W., Roche L. The Use of Students’Evaluation and an Individually Structured Intervention to Enhance University Teaching Ef f ectiveness. American Educational Research Journal. 1993. Vol. 30. № 1. P. 217–251.
• Rocca K.A., & McCroskey J.C. The Interrelationship of Student Ratings of Instructors’ Immediacy, Verbal Aggressiveness, Homophily, and Interpersonal Attraction. Communication Education. 1999. № 48. Р. 308–316
• Wright S. L., & Jenkins-Guarnieri M. A. Student evaluations of teaching: Combining the meta-analyses and demonstrating further evidence for effective use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 2012. № 37. Р. 683–699. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.563279
References
• Erofeeva, N. E. (2015) Monytorynh «Prepodavatel hlazamy studentov» kak ynstrument rehulyrovanyia professyonalnoi deiatelnosty pedahoha y povyshenyia kachestva obuchenyia v vuze. Monitoring "Student viewer" as a tool for regulating the professional activities of the pedestrian site. Science. 7. № 5. http://naukovedenie.ru/PDF/229PVN515.pdf
• Zhabenko, O.V. (2019) Profesiinyi rozvytok naukovo-pedahohichnykh pratsivnykiv universytetiv Ukrainy: osoblyvosti orhanizatsii otsiniuvannia. Professional development of scientific and pedagogical workers of the universities of Ukraine: features of the organization of evaluation. Young scientist. 8 (72). 234–240. http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/ 2019/9/80.pdf
• Koshevaia, S.E. (2018) Postanovka zadachy razrabotky mobylnoho prylozhenyia dlia provedenyia anketyrovanyia «Prepodavatel hlazamy studentov». Formulation of the task of developing a mobile application for conducting the survey "Student through the eyes of students". Scientific works KubGTU. 3. 200–203.
• Kuprii, T.G. (2019) Sotsiolohichne opytuvannia «Vykladach ochyma studentiv» yak zasib vymiriuvannia yakosti osvity ZVO Sociological survey "Teacher through the eyes of students" as a means of measuring the quality of university education. Kyiv Philosophical Studies - 2019. Kyiv: Borys Grinchenko University of Kyiv. 314–318
• Lytvynova, T. A., Ovsianko, E. V., Zalavyna, S. V., Samatova, Y. M., Horodkova, E. V., Ponomarenko, Yu. L., Ovsianko, Ya. U. (2008) Upravlenye kachestvom uchebnoho protsessa y pedahohycheskoi deiatelnostiu cherez anketyrovanye obuchaiushchykhsia. Management of quality of educational process and pedagogical activity through questioning of students. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State University. 2. 54–59
• Chan, Y.F., & Shuhaily, O. A. (2011) Case Study of Student Evaluation of Teaching in University. International Education Studies. № 4(1). Р. 44–50.
• Chan, Y.F. (2012) Student Evaluation of Lecturer Performance Among Private University Students Canadian. Social Science. Vol. 8. № 4. Р. 238-243.
• Horban, O., Kravchenko, O., Martych, R., & Yukhymenko, N. (2019). The regulatory functions of education in behavioral models. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (3), Р. 152–157. https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2019-3/23.
• Horban, O., Kuprii, T., Martych, R., &Panasiuk, L. (2020). Implications of total quality management in Ukrainian higher education institutions: international experience. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, (2), Р. 126–130. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-2/126
• Koshmanova, T. S., Hapon, N. P., & Carter, C. C. (2007) Extreme social situations in the narratives of Ukrainian teacher candidates. Teaching and Teacher Education. № 23 (4). Р. 215–225.
• Magno C., & Sembrano J. (2008) The Role of Teacher Efficacy and Characteristics on Teaching Effectiveness, Performance, and Use of Learner-Centered practices. The Asia PacificEducation Researcher. № 16 (1). Р. 73–90.
• Marsh, H.W., Roche, L. (1993) The Use of Students’Evaluation and an Individually Structured Intervention to Enhance University Teaching Ef f ectiveness. American Educational Research Journal. Vol. 30. № 1. P. 217–251.
• Rocca, K.A., & McCroskey, J.C. (1999) The Interrelationship of Student Ratings of Instructors’ Immediacy, Verbal Aggressiveness, Homophily, and Interpersonal Attraction. Communication Education. № 48. Р. 308–316
• Wright, S. L., & Jenkins-Guarnieri, M. A. (2012) Student evaluations of teaching: Combining the meta-analyses and demonstrating further evidence for effective use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. № 37. Р. 683–699. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.563279
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Educological discourse
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Автори зберігають за собою всі авторські права та одночасно надають журналу право першої публікації на умовах лізенції Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, що дозволяє розповсюджувати даний матеріал із зазначенням авторства та первинної публікації в даному журналі.
