This is an outdated version published on 2026-06-30. Read the most recent version.

Didactic autonomy of a geography teacher in the context of developing students’ spatial thinking

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829/2026.1.13

Keywords:

competency-based education, didactic autonomy, geography teacher, New Ukrainian School, spatial thinking, spatial competence

Abstract

The article presents a theoretical and pedagogical analysis of the didactic autonomy of a geography teacher as a key pedagogical condition for the development of students’ spatial thinking within the framework of the New Ukrainian School reform. The relevance of the study is determined by the contradiction between the increasing standardization of general secondary education curricula and the need for flexible pedagogical interpretation aimed at achieving competency-based learning outcomes. Based on the synthesis of contemporary pedagogical research and regulatory educational documents, an authorial definition of the concept of “didactic autonomy of a geography teacher” is proposed. Didactic autonomy is interpreted as an integrated professional and pedagogical characteristic that enables teachers to independently select, adapt, and combine the content, methods, forms, and instructional tools of teaching to effectively develop students’ spatial thinking in accordance with educational standards and learners’ needs. A structural model of didactic autonomy is substantiated, including content-related, methodological, organizational, and evaluative-reflective components, whose interaction ensures the implementation of activity-based and inquiry-oriented approaches in geography education. The empirical component of the study is based on a questionnaire survey of geography teachers in general secondary education institutions. The results indicate that a higher level of didactic autonomy is associated with more frequent use of research-based, project-oriented, and local geography methods, which contribute to the development of spatial analysis skills. At the same time, the application of geoinformation technologies and field research remains limited due to material, technical, and organizational constraints. The practical significance of the research lies in the possibility of applying its findings in methodological support for geography teachers, professional development programs, and further elaboration of didactic models that enhance teacher autonomy as a factor in improving the quality of geography education and fostering students’ spatial thinking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Tetiana Yemchuk, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

PhD in Geography, Associate Professor, Assistant at the Department of Economic Geography and Environmental Management

References

Vietrova, I. (2017). Problema rozvytku avtonomnosti uchnia yak neobkhidna skladova pidhotovky maibutnoho vchytelia anhliiskoi movy [The problem of developing learner autonomy as a necessary component of training future English teachers]. Nova Pedahohichna Dumka, 2(90), 42–45 (ukr).

Husak, Yu. (2023). Suchasni pidkhody do rozuminnia zmistu i sutnosti poniattia “osvitnia avtonomnist” [Modern approaches to understanding the content and essence of the concept of “educational autonomy”]. Osvita. Innovatyka. Praktyka, 11(6), 44–48 (ukr). https://doi.org/10.31110/2616-650X-vol11i6-007

Hurlieva, T. (2008). Avtonomnist yak oznaka i rushiina syla osobystisnoho zrostannia [Autonomy as a sign and driving force of personal growth]. Aktualni Problemy Psykholohii, 3(5), 61–75 (ukr).

Derzhavnyi standart bazovoi serednoi osvity [State Standard of Basic Secondary Education]. (2020). https://mon.gov.ua/osvita-2/zagalna-serednya-osvita/nova-ukrainska-shkola-2/derzhavniy-standart-bazovoi-serednoi-osviti (ukr).

Zaverukha, O. V. (2014). Psykholohichni osoblyvosti rozvytku avtonomnosti u pidlitkovomu vitsi [Psychological features of autonomy development in adolescence]. Problemy Suchasnoi Psykholohii, 2(6), 55–62 (ukr).

Zakon Ukrainy “Pro osvitu” vid 05.09.2017 № 2145-VIII, st. 23 [Law of Ukraine “On Education” of September 5, 2017 No. 2145-VIII, Article 23]. (2017). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19/conv#n370 (ukr).

Yemchuk, T. V., & Zaiachuk, M. D. (2022). Osoblyvosti formuvannia liderskykh yakostei u studentiv heohrafichnykh fakultetiv [Features of the formation of leadership qualities in students of geography faculties]. Naukovi Zapysky. Seriia: Pedahohichni Nauky, 207, 394–401 (ukr). https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2022-1-207-394-401

Yemchuk, T. V., & Rudenko, V. P. (2024). Tiutorska diialnist yak zaporuka uspikhu maibutnikh vchyteliv heohrafii [Tutoring activity as a guarantee of success for future geography teachers]. Naukovi Zapysky. Seriia: Pedahohichni Nauky, 213, 132–140 (ukr). https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2024-1-213-132-140

Kurysh, N. K. (2024). Akademichna svoboda vchytelia Novoi ukrainskoi shkoly yak odyn iz resursiv profesiinoho stanovlennia [Academic freedom of a New Ukrainian School teacher as one of the resources of professional development]. Osvita ta Pedahohichna Nauka, 3(187), 38–46 (ukr). https://doi.org/10.12958/2227-2747-2024-3(187)-38-46

Kontseptsiia Novoi ukrainskoi shkoly [Concept of the New Ukrainian School]. (2016). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/988-2016-р#Text (ukr).

Bednarz, S. W., & Kemp, K. (2011). Understanding and nurturing spatial literacy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 21, 18–23.

Brooks, C. (2016). Geography education in the 21st century. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315758459

Golledge, R. G. (2002). The nature of geographic knowledge. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8306.00276

Jo, I., & Bednarz, S. W. (2009). Evaluating geography textbook questions from a spatial perspective: Using concepts of space, tools of representation, and cognitive processes to evaluate spatiality. Journal of Geography, 108(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340902758401

Lambert, D. (2011). Reviewing the case for geography, and the “knowledge turn” in the English national curriculum. The Curriculum Journal, 22(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2011.574991

National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11019

UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444

Published

2026-06-30

Versions

How to Cite

[1]
T. Yemchuk, “Didactic autonomy of a geography teacher in the context of developing students’ spatial thinking”, OD, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 211–227, Jun. 2026.

Issue

Section

Continuing postgraduate professional education