Developing Scientific Competence: Technologies, Tools, and Prospects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2312-5829/2025.2.13Keywords:
adaptive learning, AR/VR, educational tools, digital literacy, teaching aids, competence approach, natural science competence, science education, chemistryAbstract
The article presents the theoretical foundations and empirical results of a study aimed at developing scientific competence among lower secondary school students. It substantiates the importance of updating learning tools in the context of educational digitalization, emphasizing the combination of traditional and modern instruments to ensure a comprehensive development of students’ knowledge, skills, and motivation. A comparative analysis of the effectiveness of traditional (printed textbooks, model-based lab activities) and modern digital tools (AR/VR, mobile applications, video lessons, simulations, gamified platforms) is provided based on six components of scientific competence: theoretical knowledge, conceptual visualization, research skills, digital literacy, motivation, and autonomy.
The study methodology included a mixed-method approach that combined quantitative and qualitative methods, such as pedagogical experiments, surveys, testing, observations, and semi-structured interviews. The results indicate a significant advantage of digital tools in developing research skills, fostering critical thinking, and enhancing student engagement, while traditional tools remain effective for structuring and consolidating core knowledge. The experiment confirmed that the most effective educational outcomes are achieved through an integrated use of both digital and traditional tools.
The scientific novelty of the study lies in the systematisation of learning tools by components of competence and the correlation of empirical results with the theoretical frameworks of Robert Gagné, Richard Mayer, John S. Brown, and Paul Duguid, regarding the cognitive and social nature of learning. Future research directions include an indepth analysis of the impact of specific digital technologies on the development of scientific competencies, adaptation of tools to blended and distance learning environments, and the design of innovative STEM-methodologies that incorporate inclusivity and interdisciplinarity.
Downloads
References
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and Organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.2.198.10116
Connelly, J. O., & Miller, P. (2018). Improving Learning Outcomes for Higher Education through Smart Technology. International Journal of Conceptual Structures and Smart Applications, 6(1), 1–17 [in English]. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijcssa.2018010101
Mayer, R. E. (2024). The Past, Present, and Future of the Cognitive theory of Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 36(1) [in English]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09842-1
Williams, M. K. (2017). John Dewey in the 21st Century. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education, 9(1) [in English]. https://digitalcommons.buffalostate.edu/jiae/vol9/iss1/7
Bykov, V. Yu., & Zhuk, Yu. O. (2005). Klasifikatsiia zasobiv navchannia [Classification of Learning Tools]. Informatsiini tekhnolohii i zasoby navchannia, 39–60 [in Ukrainian].
Bykov, V. Yu., & Lapynskyi, V. V. (2018). Modeli vidkrytoi osvity ta dystantsiinoho navchannia: teoriia i praktyka [Models of Open Education and Distance Learning: Theory and practice]. Kyiv: Atika [in Ukrainian].
Bykov, V. Yu., Spirin, O. M., & Shyshkina, M. P. (2015). Korparatyvni informatsiini systemy pidtrymuvannia naukovo-osvitnoi diialnosti [Corporate Information Systems for Supporting Scientific and Educational Activities]. Problemy ta perspektyvy formuvannia natsionalnoi humanitarno-tekhnichnoi elity, 43(47), pt. 2, 178–206 [in Ukrainian].
Bilous, V. I., & Ivanchenko, L. M. (2019). Dydaktyka u tsyfrovu epokhu: novi pidkhody [Didactics in the Digital Age: New approaches]. Kyiv: Osvitni horyzonty [in Ukrainian].
Topuzov, O. M. (Ed.). (2023). Diahnostyka ta kompensatsiia osvitnikh vtrat u zahalnii serednii osviti Ukrainy: metodychni rekomendatsii [Diagnostics and Compensation of Educational Losses in General Secondary Education of Ukraine: Methodical recommendations]. Kyiv: Pedahohichna dumka [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32405/978-966-644-736-7-2023-190
Kramarenko, I., Fonariuk, O., & Zatserkivna, M. (2022). Tsyfrovyzatsiia osvity — novi vyklyky ta perspektyvy rozvytku [Digitalization of Education — New Challenges and Development Prospects]. Perspektyvy ta innovatsii nauky, (2)7 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-4952-2022-2(7)-392-404
Piekhota, O. M., & Smolinska, I. V. (2019). Innovatsiini pedahohichni tekhnolohii u tsyfrovomu seredovyshchi [Innovative Pedagogical Technologies in the Digital Environment]. Kyiv: Osvitnii prostir [in Ukrainian].
Instytut pedahohiky NAPN Ukrainy. (2025). Formuvannia pryrodnycho-naukovoi kompetentnosti uchniv himnazii u navchanni khimii: metodychnyi posibnyk [Formation of Students’ Scientific Competence in Chemistry Teaching: Methodological guide]. Instytut pedahohiky NAPN Ukrainy [in Ukrainian]. https://undip.org.ua/library/formuvannia-pryrodnycho-naukovoi-kompetentnosti-uchniv-himnazii-u-navchanni-khimii-metodychnyy-posibnyk/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Educological discourse

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Автори зберігають за собою всі авторські права та одночасно надають журналу право першої публікації на умовах лізенції Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License, що дозволяє розповсюджувати даний матеріал із зазначенням авторства та первинної публікації в даному журналі.